.com availability
Free tools: Usually
Usually the core feature, often with premium-price detection.
NameVerdict
Live registry (RDAP) lookups for .com, .io, .app, .dev, and .ai.
Free name check vs. preliminary screen
Free name generators and checkers are great at the first pass: they confirm the .com, run a trademark search, and look up social handles. The problems that force a rename after launch usually show up somewhere else.
Coverage varies by tool; this is the typical pattern across free name generators and availability checkers.
.com availability
Free tools: Usually
Usually the core feature, often with premium-price detection.
NameVerdict
Live registry (RDAP) lookups for .com, .io, .app, .dev, and .ai.
USPTO trademark search
Free tools: Often
Exact or fuzzy name matches against federal records.
NameVerdict
Structured search of live USPTO records with serial numbers, status, goods/services, TSDR links, and class-overlap annotation for your product.
Social handles
Free tools: Often
Availability across several platforms.
NameVerdict
Instagram, GitHub, and TikTok handle availability.
Unregistered (common-law) use
Free tools: Rarely
Businesses and apps using a name without a federal registration are invisible to a USPTO search.
NameVerdict
GitHub, Apple's app catalog, and Reddit, plus best-effort Product Hunt and Crunchbase web searches.
Who already owns the search results
Free tools: Rarely
A name can be legally open and still be unwinnable in search.
NameVerdict
The visible web-search landscape for the name today.
Collisions in your category
Free tools: Rarely
Matches are listed without asking what your product is.
NameVerdict
Names that already mean something specific in your market, scoped to your product description and Nice class.
A verdict you can audit and share
Free tools: Rarely
Typically a score or a list of matches.
NameVerdict
GREEN / YELLOW / RED per name with the evidence and limitations inline, a private report URL, and a PDF export.
A federal search only sees registered marks. Plenty of businesses build rights simply by using a name, and they never show up in a USPTO lookup. A name can also be legally open and still be a poor choice if an established product already owns the search results, or if the name already means something specific in your category.
Context matters too. Two products can share a name when they sell unrelated things, so a list of exact matches without your product and class in view either alarms you about irrelevant marks or misses a related one. NameVerdict scopes its research to the product you describe and the Nice class you pick (or infers one), then weighs all six signals into one verdict per name.
Paste up to five finalists and a one-sentence product description. Reports typically come back in about a minute per name.
A free check answers "is the .com open and is there an obvious federal registration?" The conflicts that force a rename later are often elsewhere: an unregistered business or app already using the name in your category, a competitor that owns the search results, or a federal mark in a related class that a plain name match does not flag as relevant. NameVerdict checks those signals together for the specific product you describe and explains the verdict with evidence.
Yes, if you do not have candidates yet. Free generators are good at producing and pre-filtering ideas. NameVerdict does not generate names; it screens the shortlist you bring. A practical workflow is: generate freely, drop names with taken .coms, then screen your top one to five finalists with NameVerdict before you buy the domain, print anything, or pay an attorney.
No. NameVerdict is preliminary name-risk screening, and so are free checkers. Neither replaces a trademark attorney's knock-out search and opinion. The point of a preliminary screen is to eliminate obvious problems cheaply so you only pay for legal work on names that survive.